Pluribus Networks
  • Home
  • Solutions
  • Partners
  • News
  • About Us
    • Team
    • Investors
    • Careers
    • Location
    • Contact Us
    • Blog
Network Switching Costs II: The 55% Tax (B)racket

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Network Switching Costs II: The 55% Tax (B)racket

2
Posted on March 23, 2012 by rolf

In a previous post, we looked at trends of cost per port for data center network switching.  Now, everyone is focused on cost per switch port but nobody seems to be paying much attention to the fact that every port requires a transceiver and a cable (whether optics or direct-attach copper).

Let’s look at your run-of-the-mill data center deployment to wire up three thousand odd servers at 10 gig. Pick your poison, but basically the transceiver-cabling tax % overhead stays the same, independent of the vendor.

Network Switching Costs

Server Access Ports (10GE) 3072
Access Uplink Ports 1024
Total Access Ports 4096
Interconnect Ports (to Aggregation & Core switches) 2560
Access ASP/Port $280
Interconnect ASP/Port $700
Access Switches ASP $1,146,880
Interconnect Switches ASP $1,792,000
Total ASP Switches (1) $2,938,880
Server Access DAC Cables 3072
Interconnect Transceivers 3584
DAC ASP (3 meter) $60
Fiber Transceiver ASP (SR) $400
Server Access DAC Cables ASP $184,320
Interconnect Transceivers ASP $1,433,600
Total Cables+Transceivers (2) $1,617,920
Cable + Transceivers Overhead as % of ASP Switches Cost(3=2/1*100) 55%
TOTAL $4,556,800

Welcome to the 55% vendor tax.

And, where else might you have expected to pay an average effective tax rate of 55%?

In the Soviet Union. In 1990.

(page 33: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1996/06/pdf/cheasty.pdf)

Glasnost? Niet. Support for apparatchik transceivers only.

Surely, you say, a lot of R&D investment has gone into these gizmos to justify their price? Nope, all made by the Avagos, Finisars, Opnexts et al. of the world.

And your vendor can publish thousands of RFC’s and other protocol alphabet soup in their datasheets but not a list of compatible (=the ones that they will support) transceivers??

So if you would like to see at least one of your favorite vendors sing and dance the kalinka, be sure to request the cheaper USR transceivers* for the 100m runs so common in today’s data centers :-)

*: A discussion on USR transceivers at Greg Ferro’s blog.

Share This :

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
This entry was posted in Network Economics and tagged cost analysis, cost per port, network cost overheads, optics and transceivers by rolf. Bookmark the permalink.

2 thoughts on “Network Switching Costs II: The 55% Tax (B)racket”

  1. S on April 19, 2012 at 10:27 PM said:

    Do you imply that Avago/Finisar etc are the beneficiaries of this tax ?

    Reply ↓
    • rolf on May 9, 2012 at 1:33 PM said:

      Thanks for clarifying. No, what I meant was the systems vendors (the Ciscos, Junipers, Aristas et al.) charge this tax for their value-add of slapping a sticker with their SKU# on the parts.

      Reply ↓

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Feed for Thought!

RSS Feed

Follow Us on Twitter

  • Pluribus will be talking about our integration with OpenStack at 9:50 on Thurs in room A104 #openstack 1 month ago
  • At the Openstack summit online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-… #openstack 1 month ago
  • Happy to be participating at the OpenStack Summit: #openstack online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-… 1 month ago
  • ASPone LTD is implementing their trading and financial applications on TIBCO FTL switches (based on the Pluribus N… aspone.co.uk/TIBCO 1 month ago
  • @leonardmcdowell Thanks for the follow. Interested in knowing more about Pluribus? 1 month ago

Categories

  • Analysis
  • Network Economics
  • Network OS
  • Network Virtualization
  • Networking Architecture
  • Open Networking
  • SDN
  • SDN & Openflow
  • TIBCO

Log In

Please log into the site.

Recent Posts

  • Pluribus Recognized as a “Top 10 SDN Start-Up to Watch” by Network World
  • A Couple of Presentations Tomorrow
  • We’ve Been Busy
  • Of Controllers and Why Nicira had to do a deal (Part III: SDN And Openflow – Enabling Network Virtualization in the Cloud)
  • Traditional Network Infrastructure Model and Problems Associated with it

Recent Comments

  • Amado on Pluribus Recognized as a “Top 10 SDN Start-Up to Watch” by Network World
  • Click This Link on Pluribus Recognized as a “Top 10 SDN Start-Up to Watch” by Network World
  • linux on SDN and Openflow- Enabling Network Virtualization in the Cloud: Part II
  • Yuqing on Of Controllers and Why Nicira had to do a deal (Part III: SDN And Openflow – Enabling Network Virtualization in the Cloud)
  • X on Of Controllers and Why Nicira had to do a deal (Part III: SDN And Openflow – Enabling Network Virtualization in the Cloud)

Archives

  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
Proudly powered by WordPress